Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 88415 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2009 13:00:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Mar 2009 13:00:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 73702 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2009 13:00:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 73598 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2009 13:00:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 73590 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2009 13:00:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:00:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jim@jagunet.com designates 209.133.192.6 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.133.192.6] (HELO jaguNET.com) (209.133.192.6) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:00:24 +0000 Received: from [10.11.0.240] (89-250-190-16.tangos.nl [89.250.190.16]) by devsys.jaguNET.com (jagunet-1.1/jagunet-1.1) with ESMTP id n2RD01fc036079; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:00:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jim@jaguNET.com) Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Branko_=C4=8Cibej?= , Paul Querna , APR Developer List Message-Id: <3E642EEB-CBDC-402E-A119-DB5F6F0ACE28@jaguNET.com> From: Jim Jagielski To: Justin Erenkrantz In-Reply-To: <5c902b9e0903261651v4c688c68l664631d56992825c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Subject: Re: Poor performance with new apr_pool Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:00:00 -0400 References: <49CB671F.9040801@apache.org> <4239a4320903260549s3679e713u3f314a870e7ad24b@mail.gmail.com> <4239a4320903260632ld52bd4h310853d66c157b5c@mail.gmail.com> <4239a4320903260740l6786164l7d682c4d8a37d59b@mail.gmail.com> <49CBB5F6.30601@apache.org> <4239a4320903261024l4ca2ecd3jd91229f9883602cd@mail.gmail.com> <49CBE671.9050201@xbc.nu> <5c902b9e0903261651v4c688c68l664631d56992825c@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mar 26, 2009, at 7:51 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > 2009/3/26 Branko =C4=8Cibej : >> Maybe it's just me, but all that seems like a monumental waste of =20 >> time. > > If we can't beat the old system by COB tomorrow consistently, then I > think we can simply revert it or we add tcmalloc as a compile-time > option if it's not too complex to use that. Before we do that, why not spin off a dev branch of what we currently =20= have so those of us interested in profiling can still do some work on it...