Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79644 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2009 22:43:32 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Mar 2009 22:43:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 93358 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2009 22:43:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 93264 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2009 22:43:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 93256 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2009 22:43:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:43:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bojan@rexursive.com designates 150.101.121.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [150.101.121.179] (HELO beauty.rexursive.com) (150.101.121.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:43:25 +0000 Received: from [10.1.120.24] (shrek.rexursive.com [10.1.120.24]) by beauty.rexursive.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52EE78C0C7; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:43:02 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: Poor performance with new apr_pool From: Bojan Smojver To: Branko =?UTF-8?Q?=C4=8Cibej?= Cc: Paul Querna , APR Developer List In-Reply-To: <49CBE671.9050201@xbc.nu> References: <49CB671F.9040801@apache.org> <4239a4320903260549s3679e713u3f314a870e7ad24b@mail.gmail.com> <4239a4320903260632ld52bd4h310853d66c157b5c@mail.gmail.com> <4239a4320903260740l6786164l7d682c4d8a37d59b@mail.gmail.com> <49CBB5F6.30601@apache.org> <4239a4320903261024l4ca2ecd3jd91229f9883602cd@mail.gmail.com> <49CBE671.9050201@xbc.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:43:01 +1100 Message-Id: <1238107382.26693.4.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.5 (2.24.5-1.fc10) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 21:32 +0100, Branko Čibej wrote: > Maybe it's just me, but all that seems like a monumental waste of > time. I don't really have the right to comment here, because I put zero effort into this, but it does look that way, doesn't it? On the other hand, there are patches that enable configurable minimal pool size. Is that something that we should maybe spend some effort on integrating? It may be good for situations where large number of pools needs to be created without using too much memory. https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40939 -- Bojan