From dev-return-21504-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Sun Mar 22 19:19:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 31998 invoked from network); 22 Mar 2009 19:19:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Mar 2009 19:19:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 28782 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2009 19:19:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 28673 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2009 19:19:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 28665 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2009 19:19:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:19:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.219.171] (HELO mail-ew0-f171.google.com) (209.85.219.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:19:47 +0000 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so1177190ewy.43 for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 12:19:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:19:11 +0300 Received: by 10.210.112.4 with SMTP id k4mr4805670ebc.0.1237749566398; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 12:19:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: Re: apr_memcache flags parameter should be apr_uint32_t, not apr_uint16_t From: Kevac Marko To: dev@apr.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Can someone say something about this? On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Kevac Marko wrote: > Hello > > apr_memcache flags parameter should be apr_uint32_t, not apr_uint16_t > > Comments? -- Marko Kevac