apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm>
Subject Re: Modular APR
Date Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:37:12 GMT
Joe Orton wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 01:46:22PM +0100, Branko ─îibej wrote:
>> IMHO having to link 55 libraries instead of one is a big pain.
> The difference should be passing a single extra argument to 
> apr-N-config.  Why such a big pain?

APR is growing in size (as it is expected to do), keeping APR split into 
small manageable pieces that do one thing, and do them well, is a good 

It is unlikely that an application will ever need to bind to every 
single one of 55 libraries. Even httpd won't, though it's modules might 
if you had to load every single one (which you don't want to do anyway).


View raw message