apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm>
Subject Re: [VOTE] LDAP in APR 2.x?
Date Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:39:18 GMT
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

> Of course not, that's why I posted.
> The clear consensus here in the room is that the current approach to
> LDAP is broken and ill thought-out (for the reasons I illuminated),
> but what there isn't consensus on is how to proceed.  Hence, the
> discussion on-list about how to proceed.  -- justin

Votes follow the discussion, they don't precede it.

What is clear is that there is a wide lack of understanding of how the 
IETF draft LDAP C API works, and before people can suggest possible 
solutions, first everyone needs to fully understand the problem they are 
trying to solve.


View raw message