apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: apr_memcache flags parameter should be apr_uint32_t, not apr_uint16_t
Date Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:18:00 GMT
Kevac Marko wrote:
> Can someone say something about this?

yes, on all architectures to speak of, 8 or 16 are promoted to 32 bits
anyways, so anything less than a 32 bit flag arg is absurd.

But we won't/can't address the problem until APR 2.0.

> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Kevac Marko <marko@kevac.org> wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> apr_memcache flags parameter should be apr_uint32_t, not apr_uint16_t
>>
>> Comments?
> 


Mime
View raw message