apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Poor performance with new apr_pool
Date Fri, 27 Mar 2009 13:00:00 GMT

On Mar 26, 2009, at 7:51 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

> 2009/3/26 Branko ─îibej <brane@xbc.nu>:
>> Maybe it's just me, but all that seems like a monumental waste of  
>> time.
>
> If we can't beat the old system by COB tomorrow consistently, then I
> think we can simply revert it or we add tcmalloc as a compile-time
> option if it's not too complex to use that.

Before we do that, why not spin off a dev branch of what we currently  
have
so those of us interested in profiling can still do some work
on it...


Mime
View raw message