Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90891 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2009 04:01:01 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Feb 2009 04:01:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 3894 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 04:01:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 3846 invoked by uid 500); 24 Feb 2009 04:01:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 3836 invoked by uid 99); 24 Feb 2009 04:01:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:01:00 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLACK X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bojan@rexursive.com designates 150.101.121.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [150.101.121.179] (HELO beauty.rexursive.com) (150.101.121.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:00:53 +0000 Received: from [10.1.120.24] (shrek.rexursive.com [10.1.120.24]) by beauty.rexursive.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145B18C0FD; Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:00:31 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: svn commit: r747266 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.3.x: ./ CHANGES build/ buildconf configure.in From: Bojan Smojver To: "William A. Rowe, Jr." Cc: dev@apr.apache.org In-Reply-To: <49A36DB8.9090903@rowe-clan.net> References: <20090224032458.F248723888A5@eris.apache.org> <49A36DB8.9090903@rowe-clan.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:00:30 +1100 Message-Id: <1235448030.2022.3.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.4 (2.24.4-1.fc10) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 21:47 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > stupid question, but did you validate the licensing implications of > this particular commit? Not sure what you mean. Is our trunk licensed differently than 1.3.x? -- Bojan