From dev-return-21454-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Wed Feb 25 12:17:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98893 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2009 12:17:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Feb 2009 12:17:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 53765 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2009 12:17:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 53725 invoked by uid 500); 25 Feb 2009 12:17:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 53716 invoked by uid 99); 25 Feb 2009 12:17:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:17:58 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gstein@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.172] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:17:50 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 27so5063145wfd.22 for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:17:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cF4NUWpKiV1oM0Iil6JStQDUkEf1aJ55cF+MfWuy0AE=; b=h4oSZKWWoZR0bZT6eAPDv1R78UEHVjY/SZHkSf4Q0cmM0RzOAMcfTLor/e3mxQV1Xy 2r68aiydgGSAqff8LQqmNJZNc99anizUbWoHE2ZUSFk/hMe9knlL4RYSFcKah73YYqp/ pWe5AcUloxub1Thd/lNWhUL/sLuJE/dJNlhJI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VM1MbAcn+bTDy1TZpuyFdf71fHbWDgk7Y/v51VUYNkcxk7mSjYUgSfIIIin7G6OxhZ RisqmrR/fcqlEhtS2yZxfQS0Qq37lBfHZlX1z0tv/XDqwIwmyXOu13i9jXPRmqcV8AGk U50A8bLbhmlWX6oXo8J29KSXAyttC5q5Vjqh8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.41.5 with SMTP id t5mr29003wfj.134.1235564249246; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 04:17:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <49A29396.7030107@apache.org> References: <20090221205948.E9CC52388882@eris.apache.org> <20090223113756.GA8593@redhat.com> <49A29396.7030107@apache.org> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:17:29 +0100 Message-ID: <6cca3db30902250417u43cd3b3bg5747431407a2f133@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: svn commit: r746589 - in /apr/apr/trunk: ./ include/ include/arch/unix/ include/arch/win32/ misc/unix/ misc/win32/ threadproc/beos/ threadproc/netware/ threadproc/os2/ threadproc/unix/ threadproc/win32/ From: Greg Stein To: Mladen Turk Cc: dev@apr.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 13:16, Mladen Turk wrote: > Joe Orton wrote: >... >> -1 > > I announced that twice on this list during the last year, > so you should spoke then thought. And people miss email. Or they thought it might be implemented differently. Or WHATEVER. It doesn't matter. There is no time limit on standing against a change. It is possible to veto something that was checked in *months* ago. That change would then have to be backed out before release, or some solution/compromise reached instead. I'm also with Joe: stuff like this can be built *on top of* APR, rather than being part of it. Create a shared memory segment, and pass a cmdline switch. Or leave a descriptor open with the name of the segment which the parent/child can write/read. These solutions could be done as part of apr-util, no? Cheers, -g