apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: On to APR 2.0.0? Beyond 9x/ME
Date Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:07:50 GMT
Paul Querna wrote:
> Branko ─îibej wrote:
>>
>> Oh, certainly. Except that sometimes the "just" is a pretty big one. I
>> remember once ... well, to make a long story short, control over pool
>> lifetime wasn't, and we ended up jumping through several Klein bottles
>> to get there.
> 
> I think a proposal to make them optional would be very interesting, I
> know some people (Garrett Rooney?) had some ideas on this.

I've seen a proposal to replace pool_clear/_destroy to call free() instead
of returning the pool to the allocator.

And we've tried implementing apr_sms for pluggable memory in the past,
see the svn history.  The performance was unacceptable.

Bill

Mime
View raw message