Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 58359 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2009 13:42:24 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Jan 2009 13:42:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 26919 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2009 13:42:22 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 26855 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2009 13:42:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 26846 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jan 2009 13:42:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:42:22 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of trawick@gmail.com designates 209.85.200.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.200.170] (HELO wf-out-1314.google.com) (209.85.200.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:42:15 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 25so6763457wfc.22 for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:41:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OSiJCw76wYyhNDMgxu9PSllXqkA8IrWm2VsGR5tw7JE=; b=l3oR2vazqDC6An14Xi5m0hcV9UjnuQZmSU9WwIIFrTy3jC0YdUxwu0RBbUOztptrg4 6nYzubpccV/0I1luORPHbpbiaAmmxvsHpMKFs6sQxoyeWcx7CML04vEXIb3oHLPTO0nU ZZ8R6L5JirR0mte/HzYms5sdp34lMFoGbLhV4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=pMmGzMzHxSMI8ZCMARetR8PONjghXxtvfQV8D4WK9p9ijOXpgUIibtJn8B2gX+dT/u 5eDpcrT8YZ1nIw2mQTkkn6+Ck+dYThh9PAGlYiOaRrr9Hpeshu8SADz4VmxKDpAiQTP0 pLV42bJg1ckFNBC7pQcHGZVT9ihK02/s4G0sw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.221.11 with SMTP id t11mr774908wfg.335.1232718115364; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:41:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6cca3db30901230440p31acf0a7x96862a2804c5f45@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090109061801.GA4431@athena.local> <496795EC.9070104@force-elite.com> <20090111070423.GA9577@athena.local> <6cca3db30901230231w738a0ff3g89b17215fd4531a9@mail.gmail.com> <6cca3db30901230440p31acf0a7x96862a2804c5f45@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 08:41:55 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: SCons Updates... 2 From: Jeff Trawick To: dev@apr.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd147105fe2180461268dc1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --000e0cd147105fe2180461268dc1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 13:24, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > >> > >> Check for ebcdic? Are we *really* going to continue support for that? > >> Seriously, folks. > > > > What is the better criteria? > > * offends sensibility of at least one APR contributor > > * actively used by and depended on by multiple APR contributors (and may > be > > a partial sponsor of the warm, dry environment necessary for APR hacking, > > though that's probably a difficult determination to make for certain) > > If it is still being used, then... well, geez. *shudder* > > And in response to your question, "duh. not like I have any super-vote > here. just opening a discussion." Here's a better opening to such a discussion ;) "Hey guys, here are some platforms/nuances/whatever currently in APR that I think we might be able to drop in 2.0. Which are still being used/maintained?" ;) --000e0cd147105fe2180461268dc1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 13:24, Jeff T= rawick <trawick@gmail.com> w= rote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Check for ebcdic? Are we *really* going to continue support for th= at?
>> Seriously, folks.
>
> What is the better criteria?
> * offends sensibility of at least one APR contributor
> * actively used by and depended on by multiple APR contributors (and m= ay be
> a partial sponsor of the warm, dry environment necessary for APR hacki= ng,
> though that's probably a difficult determination to make for certa= in)

If it is still being used, then... well, geez.  *shudder*<= br>
And in response to your question, "duh. not like I have any super-vote=
here. just opening a discussion."

Here's a be= tter opening to such a discussion ;)

"Hey guys, here are some p= latforms/nuances/whatever currently in APR that I think we might be able to= drop in 2.0.  Which are still being used/maintained?" ;)  <= br>
--000e0cd147105fe2180461268dc1--