Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76843 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2009 04:52:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jan 2009 04:52:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 5152 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2009 04:52:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 5105 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jan 2009 04:52:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 5096 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jan 2009 04:52:27 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 20:52:27 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.38] (HELO smtpauth21.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.38) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Sat, 03 Jan 2009 04:52:19 +0000 Received: (qmail 25525 invoked from network); 3 Jan 2009 04:51:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (76.252.112.72) by smtpauth21.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.38) with ESMTP; 03 Jan 2009 04:51:58 -0000 Message-ID: <495EEEED.8060105@rowe-clan.net> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 22:51:57 -0600 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Querna CC: APR Developer List Subject: Re: On to APR 2.0.0? Beyond 9x/ME References: <495EA9EE.2090009@rowe-clan.net> <495EC0B6.1040505@force-elite.com> In-Reply-To: <495EC0B6.1040505@force-elite.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Paul Querna wrote: > > Are there any APIs currently in trunk but not in 1.3.x? > > If so, I'd suggest branching trunk to 1.x, incase we end up doing a > 1.4.x, and then you can continue on trunk..... I'd concur if anyone who owns those changes wants to own up now to some desire to ship 1.4.x. OTOH, from the first big-red-commit, we can always branch from rev-1. So unless anyone owns up to a desire to push out their changes as 1.4.0 I'm tempted to keep the backporting "simple" and just move up to 2.0. Bill