On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Greg Stein <email@example.com> wrote:
Check for ebcdic? Are we *really* going to continue support for that?
What is the better criteria?
* offends sensibility of at least one APR contributor
* actively used by and depended on by multiple APR contributors (and may be a partial sponsor of the warm, dry environment necessary for APR hacking, though that's probably a difficult determination to make for certain)