Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Andr=E9_Malo?= <nd@perlig.de>
Organization: TIMTOWTDI
To: dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Re: Apache Portable Runtime artifacts
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 23:01:21 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10
References: <8A57D7FB-D3BB-41C7-8DF2-A1EBCA49439C@toolazydogs.com>
 <49159BB5.1050300@apache.org>
 <29051CDC-B8F7-4209-8237-AC9450D46B95@toolazydogs.com>
In-Reply-To: <29051CDC-B8F7-4209-8237-AC9450D46B95@toolazydogs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200811082301.21982@news.perlig.de>

* Alan D. Cabrera wrote:

> On Nov 8, 2008, at 6:01 AM, Max Bowsher wrote:
> > Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> >> I would like to publish the APR artifacts into the Maven repository,
> >> [1].  I think that the group id should be org.apache.apr and the
> >> artifact id should be apr.
> >>
> >> Does anyone have a problem with these group and artifact ids?  Does
> >> anyone have a problem with me publishing these artifacts?
> >
> > What are the specifics of the artifacts you were thinking of
> > publishing?
> > APR is not a Java project after all.  I do realize that strictly
> > speaking, Maven is not just for Java, but any publishing of native
> > code
> > into Maven tends to be fraught with difficulties.
>
> What difficulties are you speaking of?
>
> You are correct, I want to publish the APR libraries so that they may
> be pulled in by  projects built with the Maven native plugin [1].
>
> > It would probably be best for the precise files being published to be
> > acked by an APR committer or PMC member before publishing.
> > Actually, wouldn't published Maven artifacts be considered an ASF
> > release and therefore needful of PMC voting?
>
> Makes sense to me.  How, exactly, should we do this?  Should I file
> Jiras w/ the POMs for the artifacts, [2], and then start a vote?

Doesn't make sense to me, as the ASF doesn't release binaries. Has that bee=
n=20
changed?

nd
=2D-=20
package Hacker::Perl::Another::Just;print
qq~@{[reverse split/::/ =3D>__PACKAGE__]}~;

#  Andr=E9 Malo  #  http://pub.perlig.de  #