apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: apr-util removal of md4/md5 algorithms (legal issue)
Date Mon, 15 Sep 2008 07:43:05 GMT
Joe Orton wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 11:13:28AM -0400, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Joe Orton <jorton@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> I just noticed that this issue is covered in the Fedora licensing FAQ:
>>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ
>>> which references this statement from RSA:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/ietf/IPR/RSA-MD-all [plain text sent as text/html, oops]
>>> the Fedora FAQ says that based on this, we can simply strip the
>>> restrictive licensing statements from the MD4/MD5 implementation,
>>> retaining the RSA copyright notice alone.
>>> Can legal-discuss@ confirm whether this is an acceptable course of
>>> action?
>> First, the above seems to present a conflicting state of affairs.
>> I've only followed the links provided, so I may not understand the
>> true story.  But if the original code was made available under the
>> original BSD with advertising clause, then there is a specific right
>> to redistribute provided, right?
> Sorry folks, I should have included more context in this.
> The code in question carries the license text referenced here:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200610.mbox/<20061016103814.GB1778@redhat.com>

So isn't the appropriate action at this point to simply amend the license
embedded in both httpd and apr to state RSA's revised license statement
offered to the IETF?

View raw message