apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: autoconf/libtool for apr and for httpd, Was: Re: Time for 1.3.3
Date Fri, 19 Sep 2008 19:45:54 GMT

On Sep 17, 2008, at 4:06 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:

> Bojan Smojver schrieb:
>> On Thu, 2008-08-07 at 17:55 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Peter, it begs the question from my last note, should we  
>>> refuse
>>> any 2.62 for packaging via our scripts, or just let it slide?
>>>
>>> My gutcheck says simply refuse 2.62.
>>
>> I would generate our configure with 2.61 (for which we know is  
>> good) and
>> let others choose their own. In many cases, distributions are  
>> shipping
>> their own patches to 2.62 that are addressing the problem, so no  
>> need to
>> ban 2.62 outright.
>
> What will be used, once httpd 2.2.10 with bundled apr/apr-util gets
> prepared? Last time (2.2.9), httpd configure plus those inside
> srclib/apr(-util) got generated with autoconf 2.62.
>

I've downgraded on my release machine to 2.61


Mime
View raw message