Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 03:48:59 +0200
From: Peter Poeml <poeml@suse.de>
To: dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Re: Time for 1.3.3
Message-ID: <20080808014859.GD4387@suse.de>
References: <489B54EB.7010300@apache.org> <489B562E.6050501@rowe-clan.net>
 <20080807224225.GB686@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C+ts3FVlLX8+P6JN"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20080807224225.GB686@suse.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Sender: Peter Poeml <poeml@suse.de>


--C+ts3FVlLX8+P6JN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 12:42:25AM +0200, Peter Poeml wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 03:08:14 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > Here's an offer, I'll tag and roll 24 hours from now unless someone tel=
ls me
> > that the API remains broken w.r.t. reslist etc.  Unless we hear it is n=
ow
> > broken, we'll presume that 1.3.3 is entirely backwards compatible to 1.=
2.12.
> >=20
> > Bill
>=20
> I am a heavy user of both mod_dbd and apr_memcache, and I'm
> investigating an apr_memcache related memleak right now that I started
> getting with 1.3.0, so I will give this a good testing in the next few
> hours.

Looks good to me -
Running fine since a few hours on two SLE10SP2 servers, busy with
database and memcache queries.

Thanks,
Peter
--=20
"WARNING: This bug is visible to non-employees. Please be respectful!"
=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH
Research & Development

--C+ts3FVlLX8+P6JN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIm6YL92K4Je+2lOoRAvnnAJ9mOBmgqbYzDi9oDR0ojK762EgOgQCfVZ5g
ivjCXMjl4R8K52rKYEPrkUY=
=ugyv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--C+ts3FVlLX8+P6JN--