Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 34485 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2008 12:25:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Jul 2008 12:25:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 28882 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2008 12:25:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 28833 invoked by uid 500); 19 Jul 2008 12:25:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 28821 invoked by uid 99); 19 Jul 2008 12:25:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:25:53 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.132.249] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.249) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 12:25:00 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c35so265161anc.44 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.194.5 with SMTP id r5mr917569anf.2.1216470324260; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.143.9 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jul 2008 05:25:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 14:25:24 +0200 From: "Sander Striker" To: "Mladen Turk" Subject: Re: Backport policy, WAS: Re: svn commit: r678140 - /apr/apr/branches/1.3.x/memory/unix/apr_pools.c Cc: dev@apr.apache.org In-Reply-To: <4881DB83.8080909@apache.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4881DB83.8080909@apache.org> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Mladen Turk wrote: > Sander Striker wrote: >>> >>> Modified: >>> apr/apr/branches/1.3.x/memory/unix/apr_pools.c >> >> This is just an example, I'm seeing a change land on trunk and a >> minute later on 1.3.x. What's our backport policy? Do we just commit >> to trunk and 1.3.x, or are we going to go a route where we get review >> prior to backporting? Think httpd STATUS... >> > > I usually wait for a day or two before committing to 1.3.x or 1.2.x > from trunk. This particular one is copy/paste typo and was not observed > until Bojan and myself did some actual hard core testing. Like I said, it was just an example. > Think the backporting policy is "act responsible" right now, > or am I wrong here? Sander