Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76561 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2008 00:20:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 28 Jul 2008 00:20:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 84573 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2008 00:20:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 84531 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jul 2008 00:20:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 84520 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jul 2008 00:20:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Jul 2008 17:20:17 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.38] (HELO smtpauth21.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.38) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:19:22 +0000 Received: (qmail 12075 invoked from network); 28 Jul 2008 00:19:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.14.203.193) by smtpauth21.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.38) with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2008 00:19:40 -0000 Message-ID: <488D1093.1080303@rowe-clan.net> Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:19:31 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bojan Smojver CC: APR Development List Subject: Re: svn commit: r677505 - /apr/apr-util/trunk/misc/apr_reslist.c References: <20080717054557.AA2E02388A45@eris.apache.org> <1216965059.31490.11.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> In-Reply-To: <1216965059.31490.11.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 05:45 +0000, mturk@apache.org wrote: > >> Use apr_pool_pre_cleanup_register for reslist cleanup > > Coming back to the original commit message and given the discussion on > the list, are we backporting this to 1.3.x or not? Or more to the point, when is 1.3.x ready to ship w.r.t. reslist? You'll note there hasn't been a 1.3.3 tag since I've been watching all of this activity, and didn't want to rush anyone. But it is past time to cut 1.3, so give me a clue how much more work is needed and how long y'all think it will take to come to consensus on the 1.3 branch.