Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 32576 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2008 08:47:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2008 08:47:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 54699 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2008 08:47:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 54650 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2008 08:47:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 54639 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2008 08:47:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 01:47:18 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bojan@rexursive.com designates 203.171.74.242 as permitted sender) Received: from [203.171.74.242] (HELO beauty.rexursive.com) (203.171.74.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:46:25 +0000 Received: from [10.1.120.24] (shrek.rexursive.com [10.1.120.24]) by beauty.rexursive.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC8040330 for ; Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:46:48 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: svn commit: r678323 - /apr/apr-util/trunk/memcache/apr_memcache.c From: Bojan Smojver To: APR Development List In-Reply-To: <48841FD2.2070708@apache.org> References: <20080720212913.9822723889F3@eris.apache.org> <1216592684.2754.71.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <48841FD2.2070708@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 18:46:48 +1000 Message-Id: <1216630008.2754.75.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 07:34 +0200, Mladen Turk wrote: > Although IMHO it makes reslist API behave like it should Agreed. > it might > break some of the existing usages where users were doing nasty tricks > with reslist to make the things not to leak memory. Yeah, that's what I was worried about as well. Let's see what others on the list think about it. -- Bojan