apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mladen Turk <mt...@apache.org>
Subject Re: apr_pool_create_core_ex, WAS: Re: svn commit: r647384 - in /apr/apr/trunk: CHANGES include/apr_pools.h memory/unix/apr_pools.c
Date Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:53:32 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Sander Striker wrote:
>> At the very least the docstring should be updated with a big fat
>> warning saying not to use it unless you know what you are doing.  And
>> maybe mention the typical use case of being in an environment with GC.
>>  Right now, there is nothing in the docstring to protect an
>> unsuspected user that thinks 'core' is a cool term and a better (more
>> convenient) API.
> ++1; especially note that apr-util objects such as apr_ldap, apr_dbd etc
> may not be compatible with such a detached pool.

OK, so the core->unmanaged should be fine I suppose like
Sander suggested?

Any problems renaming the API in 1.3.x as well?


View raw message