Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 35895 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2008 15:50:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2008 15:50:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 69165 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2008 15:50:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 69100 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2008 15:50:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 69089 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2008 15:50:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:50:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lucian.grijincu@gmail.com designates 209.85.146.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.146.179] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:49:11 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so5900988wah.25 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:49:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=oBlybEoeFcn3OKRhpee0o3v80CPl2j6+jwPhqyg3EWc=; b=utsh/RFD3+iAi4pYaitJJVUIparJ2x7WemeqZ7XMf2bige70/7YcRhP9z2+SlycUsX gafcxDVBbrE6W0eBljqJb4JqGj9cOMyge6gtnPlGRYK8GF+sZ2r0WBm2SRRBSbGaMY3i 41zNRnI4XiNss1ELIEWNdaicboFzaXmyVVcuo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=h+E+zJbnRoWktKhaKMuOEykbHPD8llGgSV4S1wzm1LpT1A4MFHmj7Ndl07AXrWasj7 cFJOxqB6udm3QIY7QCG/+iuT7oScUhGD5/nnDZzAYEXqN4PT5DeC/0lQ+68rwiqbDJJ/ xlo/G8soMWATy6iZY1Vg8CmSXni6itD/OQzPs= Received: by 10.114.123.19 with SMTP id v19mr8115626wac.168.1213717762458; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.235.7 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 18:49:22 +0300 From: "Lucian Adrian Grijincu" To: "Paul Querna" Subject: Re: [vote] Release apr[-util] 1.3.2 Cc: "William A. Rowe, Jr." , "APR Developer List" In-Reply-To: <4857DBCE.9010801@force-elite.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4857BEB6.3080007@rowe-clan.net> <4857DBCE.9010801@force-elite.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 18:44, Paul Querna wrote: > On a release tarball, you shouldn't have to run buildconf, infact I'd say > its better not too -- we want to make sure the packagers generated > ./configure works correctly. I know this policy. I first tested both apr and apr-util with the tar ball provided ./configure. There were no incidents. Afterwards I ran ./buildconf to see whether some things run haywire because of it. The only thing noteworthy was apr-util's ./buildconf warning. All tests ran ok. -- Lucian