On 06/15/2008 07:39 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>
>> The attached patch fixes this for me, but as I am no autoconf specialist
>> some remote eyes seem to be a good idea before committing.
> 
> Do you know offhand that multiple AC_CACHE_VAL( ac_cv_val, ...) entries
> are legit?  Provided they are, your patch appears to handle all of the
> nesting without introducing other duplications!

Sorry I do not know. That was one of the reasons I asked for remote eyes :-).

Regards

Rüdiger