From dev-return-20473-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Fri Jun 13 01:56:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 74972 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2008 01:56:55 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Jun 2008 01:56:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 70596 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2008 01:56:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 70543 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2008 01:56:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 70531 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2008 01:56:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 18:56:56 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bojan@rexursive.com designates 203.171.74.242 as permitted sender) Received: from [203.171.74.242] (HELO beauty.rexursive.com) (203.171.74.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 01:56:07 +0000 Received: from [10.1.120.24] (shrek.rexursive.com [10.1.120.24]) by beauty.rexursive.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2EB4C009E for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:55:54 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: svn commit: r667300 - /apr/apr-util/trunk/build/dbd.m4 From: Bojan Smojver To: APR Development List In-Reply-To: <4851BCA6.9060309@rowe-clan.net> References: <20080613001113.7A8AD2388A08@eris.apache.org> <4851BCA6.9060309@rowe-clan.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:55:53 +1000 Message-Id: <1213322153.23226.49.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.2 (2.22.2-2.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 19:17 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > This is looking great, do we feel it's ready for people to try out with > apr 1.3.1? Tom, Do you have an opinion on this? PS. I would personally prefer to see ODBC DBC in 1.3.1. -- Bojan