apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: tabs
Date Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:02:16 GMT
Hmmm... the issue with that, however, is that backports
to 1.3 will come from trunk (mostly) and they won't apply
cleanly if trunk is detab but 1.3 is entab.

On Jun 13, 2008, at 3:36 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

> Will do trunk then...
>
> On Jun 13, 2008, at 3:27 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>
>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Topic for a fun conversation: Should we detab the various
>>> APR source? We've never really instituted a specific coding
>>> style, ala httpd, but 1.3.x might not be a bad place to start.
>>> I'm proposing this for post-1.3.1 release, btw :)
>>
>> Please don't :(  Detab trunk/ if you would - otherwise the noise
>> of which diff's are applied gets harder to read.  Since 1.3.x
>> is in maintenance, cosmetics are no longer the best.
>>
>> If you have something to handle the horrible >80 col source that
>> people have thrown in, that would be great too :)
>>
>> Bill
>>
>


Mime
View raw message