apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Querna <c...@force-elite.com>
Subject Re: [vote] Release apr[-util] 1.3.2
Date Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:44:14 GMT
Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 16:40, William A. Rowe, Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>> Candidates will be up at http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ once the sync
>> happens within the hour... vote away;
>>
> 
> Ubuntu x86 2.6.24-19-generic
>>  [+1] Release apr 1.3.2 as GA
>>  [+1] Release apr-util 1.3.2 as GA
> 
> The only thing that stands out is apr-util's ./buildconf:
> autoheader: WARNING: Using auxiliary files such as `acconfig.h', `config.h.bot'
> autoheader: WARNING: and `config.h.top', to define templates for `config.h.in'
> autoheader: WARNING: is deprecated and discouraged.
> autoheader:
> autoheader: WARNING: Using the third argument of `AC_DEFINE' and
> autoheader: WARNING: `AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED' allows one to define a
> template without
> autoheader: WARNING: `acconfig.h':
> autoheader:
> autoheader: WARNING:   AC_DEFINE([NEED_FUNC_MAIN], 1,
> autoheader: 		[Define if a function `main' is needed.])
> autoheader:
> autoheader: WARNING: More sophisticated templates can also be produced, see the
> autoheader: WARNING: documentation.
> 
> but this is a non-issue :)
> 

On a release tarball, you shouldn't have to run buildconf, infact I'd 
say its better not too -- we want to make sure the packagers generated 
./configure works correctly.

-Paul


Mime
View raw message