apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject showstopper to 1.3.1?
Date Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:42:03 GMT
Guys, if anyone is looking at this, I'll hold off from tagging a bit longer,
as I'd rather have apr-1.3.1 address all the platform quirks we identified
in preparing 2.2.9 for release.  But if I hear nothing, I'll have to just 
move ahead :)

Bill

Paul Querna wrote:
> 
> On aurora.apache.org, shortly after installing the new version, we hit a 
> problem with apr_pollset_poll:
> 
> [Thu Jun 12 05:36:51 2008] [error] (70007)The timeout specified has 
> expired: apr_pollset_poll: (listen)
> [Thu Jun 12 05:36:52 2008] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down
> 
> If you look in worker.c, around line 687, you can see that if do a 
> graceful shutdown if we get an unexpected error from apr_pollset_poll.
> 
> This appears to be a regression caused by r641661:
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=641661
> 
> Which was a fix for PR 42580: 
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42580
> 
> This appears to be an relative edge case on Solaris 10 -- it hasn't 
> happened again, and it is a regression in APR, but relatively small, so 
> I am still +1 for httpd-2.2.9 shipping.


Mime
View raw message