Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 78422 invoked from network); 22 May 2008 16:53:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 May 2008 16:53:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 34221 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2008 16:53:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 34164 invoked by uid 500); 22 May 2008 16:53:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 34153 invoked by uid 99); 22 May 2008 16:53:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 May 2008 09:53:45 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.99] (HELO smtpauth05.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.99) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 22 May 2008 16:52:51 +0000 Received: (qmail 22394 invoked from network); 22 May 2008 16:53:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (71.239.140.137) by smtpauth05.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.99) with ESMTP; 22 May 2008 16:53:11 -0000 Message-ID: <4835A4F6.4020402@rowe-clan.net> Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 11:53:10 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Jagielski CC: APR Developer List Subject: Re: 1.2 and/or 1.3 releases? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Jim Jagielski wrote: > Are we planning on doing the APR 1.2 and/or 1.3 releases soon? > Let me know what I can do to help to get this along. The biggest help right now is to ensure apr-1.3 is ready. apr-util-1.3 should be done in just a bit, I'm testing the modular dso logic. I thought apr was, but from my last comments about the crypto error codes to nowhere, it obviously isn't quite ready. So the best help anyone could offer is to simply diff apr-1.2 branch to the apr-1.3 branch, and determine if anything else nefarious has crept in, or if any of the new prototype declarations in the include/ tree are nonsensical. (e.g. out arg as the last not first arg, etc). And best yet, a +/- and explanation once anyone completes this effort.