On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 15:56 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> Then if we consider this non-portable, the prepared statement cache
> certainly should not be a static, but scoped per apr_dbd_t?
> 
> I would prefer we /not/ offer dbd specific features, as the hacks around
> the initial row offset illustrate we contribute to per-platform hackery
> instead of resolving it for the user.

I'm not sure what you mean here...

-- 
Bojan