From dev-return-20110-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Mon May 12 21:35:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 85700 invoked from network); 12 May 2008 21:35:00 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 12 May 2008 21:35:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 82655 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2008 21:35:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 82271 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2008 21:35:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 82260 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2008 21:35:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 May 2008 14:35:01 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bojan@rexursive.com designates 203.171.74.242 as permitted sender) Received: from [203.171.74.242] (HELO beauty.rexursive.com) (203.171.74.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 May 2008 21:34:16 +0000 Received: from [10.1.120.24] (shrek.rexursive.com [10.1.120.24]) by beauty.rexursive.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C1B40393; Tue, 13 May 2008 07:34:29 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: apr_reslist semantics From: Bojan Smojver To: "William A. Rowe, Jr." Cc: Ruediger Pluem , APR Developer List In-Reply-To: <4828B236.6040504@rowe-clan.net> References: <20080512202209.79187ffa@grimnir> <4828AE2F.9020101@apache.org> <4828B236.6040504@rowe-clan.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 07:34:29 +1000 Message-Id: <1210628069.13657.42.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-4.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 16:10 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Like Roy, I'm frustrated with aprutil's dependency madness, and I'm working > right now on abstracting out apu-util into a loadable module. At this point > a --with-ldap build on linux FC8 is producing this pile of crap as bindings > for those applications with no use for ldap; > > +libldap-2.3.so.0 > +liblber-2.3.so.0 > +libresolv.so.2 > +libsasl2.so.2 > +libssl.so.6 > +libcrypto.so.6 > +libgssapi_krb5.so.2 > +libkrb5.so.3 > +libcom_err.so.2 > +libk5crypto.so.3 > +libz.so.1 > +libkrb5support.so.0 > +libkeyutils.so.1 > +libselinux.so.1 Aren't these coming from OpenLDAP: --------------------------------------- $ ldd /usr/lib/libldap.so linux-gate.so.1 => (0x00110000) liblber-2.3.so.0 => /usr/lib/liblber-2.3.so.0 (0x00c83000) libresolv.so.2 => /lib/libresolv.so.2 (0x005da000) libsasl2.so.2 => /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2 (0x02d7f000) libssl.so.6 => /lib/libssl.so.6 (0x004d1000) libcrypto.so.6 => /lib/libcrypto.so.6 (0x02fb0000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00744000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x008ca000) libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x03c7f000) libgssapi_krb5.so.2 => /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 (0x00cd5000) libkrb5.so.3 => /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3 (0x00d54000) libcom_err.so.2 => /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x00101000) libk5crypto.so.3 => /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x00cad000) libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0x008ec000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00721000) libkrb5support.so.0 => /usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.0 (0x00b34000) libkeyutils.so.1 => /lib/libkeyutils.so.1 (0x006e4000) libselinux.so.1 => /lib/libselinux.so.1 (0x00186000) --------------------------------------- BTW, if you do link to to OpenLDAP on F8, all these things do make sense to OpenLDAP - they are not useless. Or did I miss something? -- Bojan