William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Christopher Key wrote:
>>>
>> I'm not sure whether this has been covered already, and whether it
>> needs to go in during a major release, but is there any chance of
>> adding apr_int8_t and apr_uint8_t typedefs?
>
> Are we happy with the patch at
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18589
>
> ?? Of course it will require corresponding apr.hw and apr.hnw changes,
> but those should be simple.
I just reviewed and buy into that patch, the '[un]signed char' definitions
should be appropriate for apr.hw and apr.hnw flavors.
Any additional eyeballs before I commit? At least one, please?
|