apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bojan Smojver <bo...@rexursive.com>
Subject Re: dbd postgresql
Date Fri, 30 May 2008 21:58:43 GMT
On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 12:00 +0100, Nick Kew wrote:

> Wouldn't a better patch be to save the message internally so that
> a subsequent dbd_pgsql_error picks it up?

AFAICT, this doesn't affect errors, just warnings and notices:


Errors can be gotten still with PQerrorMessage(), which is what
dbd_pgsql_error() does. Do we really want to start mixing these up?


Does the patch actually stop that output that you mentioned or not?


View raw message