Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79393 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2008 20:35:03 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 25 Apr 2008 20:35:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 36413 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2008 20:35:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 36365 invoked by uid 500); 25 Apr 2008 20:35:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 36346 invoked by uid 99); 25 Apr 2008 20:35:02 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:35:02 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.40.195.232] (HELO verdesmares.com) (209.40.195.232) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:34:10 +0000 Received: from endora.local (unknown [201.21.165.181]) by verdesmares.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27294E58B14; Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4812404C.4030905@apache.org> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 17:34:20 -0300 From: Davi Arnaut User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Geoff Greer CC: "William A. Rowe, Jr." , dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: Patch to fix sendfile on OS X References: <11286.64.172.17.3.1209066267.squirrel@webmail.mipsisrisc.com> <77024D80-3994-4FD4-B74E-1598756A6769@mipsisrisc.com> <48121B02.1050606@rowe-clan.net> In-Reply-To: <48121B02.1050606@rowe-clan.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Geoff Greer wrote: >> Ugh, I actually broke apr_socket_sendfile on OS X when I cleaned up my >> code for submission. Here is a patch for my patch. > > Please look one more time. client nonblocking and client timeout appear > to work; client blocking appears to fail. > Also please take a look at the mail thread with subject "sendfile(2) misbehaves when header iovecs are specified" on this same mailing list. Regards, -- Davi Arnaut