Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 40128 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2008 21:15:59 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 24 Apr 2008 21:15:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 16389 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2008 21:16:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 16346 invoked by uid 500); 24 Apr 2008 21:16:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 16335 invoked by uid 99); 24 Apr 2008 21:16:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:16:00 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:15:15 +0000 Received: (qmail 39987 invoked by uid 2161); 24 Apr 2008 21:15:33 -0000 Received: from [192.168.2.4] (euler.heimnetz.de [192.168.2.4]) by cerberus.heimnetz.de (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id 742D31721C for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:15:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4810F87E.90403@apache.org> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 23:15:42 +0200 From: Ruediger Pluem User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: APR Developer List Subject: Re: svn commit: r651395 - in /apr/apr/trunk: CHANGES network_io/unix/sendrecv.c References: <20080424202604.56D441A9832@eris.apache.org> <4810F2EB.5090908@apache.org> <4810F716.30807@rowe-clan.net> In-Reply-To: <4810F716.30807@rowe-clan.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 04/24/2008 11:09 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> >> Maybe stupid question, but shouldn't this be 1.4.0 instead of 1.3.0 in >> the meantime? > > Already backported in the meantime, yes I could have applied three commits > but that seemed *really* pedantic. Ups. My bad. I did not notice that the CHANGES file on trunk still contains a 1.3.0 section for the changes done there. Maybe I got confused because we changed this over in httpd land a while ago and changes that are backported are no longer contained in the trunk CHANGES file. At least in theory :-). But Jim does a pretty good job in tracking this. Regards Rüdiger