Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 13268 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2008 21:09:22 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Apr 2008 21:09:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 58209 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2008 21:09:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 57826 invoked by uid 500); 14 Apr 2008 21:09:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 57807 invoked by uid 99); 14 Apr 2008 21:09:22 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:09:22 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:08:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 13224 invoked by uid 2161); 14 Apr 2008 21:08:58 -0000 Received: from [192.168.2.4] (euler.heimnetz.de [192.168.2.4]) by cerberus.heimnetz.de (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id 124921721C for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:08:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4803C7E8.8000508@apache.org> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 23:08:56 +0200 From: Ruediger Pluem User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r647394 - in /apr/apr/trunk: CHANGES include/apr_pools.h memory/unix/apr_pools.c References: <20080412084300.9BF171A9832@eris.apache.org> <20080414194357.GB16091@redhat.com> <4803C219.9070001@apache.org> <20080414205213.GA17510@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20080414205213.GA17510@redhat.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 04/14/2008 10:52 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:44:09PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote: >> But now that we have branched 1.3.0 we have to live with it until 2.0, right? >> Maybe branching just 48 hours after these commits wasn't such a good idea >> especially with these 48 hours being a weekend after ApacheCon. > > Nothing is fixed in stone on the 1.3.x branch until a 1.3.0 release is > made and approved. Having the 1.3.x branch there is fine and useful. Then everything is fine and I agree that it is *very* useful to have the branch just to iron out such problems. As mentioned I thought and was worried that we would have to live for a long time we such issues that did not have enough discussion. Regards Rüdiger