apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org>
Subject Re: svn commit: r647394 - in /apr/apr/trunk: CHANGES include/apr_pools.h memory/unix/apr_pools.c
Date Mon, 14 Apr 2008 21:08:56 GMT


On 04/14/2008 10:52 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 10:44:09PM +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>> But now that we have branched 1.3.0 we have to live with it until 2.0, right?
>> Maybe branching just 48 hours after these commits wasn't such a good idea
>> especially with these 48 hours being a weekend after ApacheCon.
> 
> Nothing is fixed in stone on the 1.3.x branch until a 1.3.0 release is 
> made and approved.  Having the 1.3.x branch there is fine and useful.

Then everything is fine and I agree that it is *very* useful to have the
branch just to iron out such problems. As mentioned I thought and was worried
that we would have to live for a long time we such issues that did not
have enough discussion.

Regards

RĂ¼diger

Mime
View raw message