Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 71358 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2008 18:54:45 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 20 Mar 2008 18:54:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 31909 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2008 18:54:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 31761 invoked by uid 500); 20 Mar 2008 18:54:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 31750 invoked by uid 99); 20 Mar 2008 18:54:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 11:54:42 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [194.242.35.95] (HELO dns-factory.at) (194.242.35.95) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 18:53:53 +0000 Received: from WSLT03 apache@gknw.net [84.63.248.162] by dns-factory.at with NetMail SMTP Agent $Revision: 8582 $ on Novell NetWare; Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:54:15 +0100 Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:54:18 +0100 From: Guenter Knauf To: covener@gmail.com, dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: LDAP over SSL on Win32 Message-ID: <72XcL81dt2PNwclM70qx8IYtIYgA4yu9UgUiRxsTTdQ@akmail> References: <7c8072a00803100426p3ee8d47dmefa9258562c2ab52@mail.gmail.com> <1404e5910803201129j7853e00oeacfbae3789b05cb@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: AK-Mail 4.01 [German] (registered, single user license) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Eric, > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: >> Although OpenLDAP would be an option too - I'm not aware of any MSVC >> port; >> with the other project I mentioned I used an older MingW32 port.... > On windows, if we chose an alternate LDAP library, would a third-party > module linking with the windows LDAP library crash and burn? I dont think so - on Win32 we do exactly specify which symbols are imported / exported..... Guenter.