Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 60557 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2008 22:00:18 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 18 Jan 2008 22:00:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 69063 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2008 22:00:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 69020 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jan 2008 22:00:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 69009 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jan 2008 22:00:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:00:06 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [137.65.248.137] (HELO sinclair.provo.novell.com) (137.65.248.137) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:59:42 +0000 Received: from INET-PRV-MTA by sinclair.provo.novell.com with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:59:46 -0700 Message-Id: <4790BF72.3235.00AC.0@novell.com> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.2 HP Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:59:37 -0700 From: "Brad Nicholes" To: "APR dev list." , "Paul J. Reder" Subject: [Fwd: Re: [Patch]: Add a couple of cases to the apr_ldap_set_option function.] References: <4790D699.6030008@remulak.net> In-Reply-To: <4790D699.6030008@remulak.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Committed. >>> On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 9:40 AM, in message <4790D699.6030008@remulak.= net>, "Paul J. Reder" wrote:=20 > Any takers? >=20 > I'm still hoping to get this reviewed by someone and have it committed = to > APR (since I don't have karma for that) so I can commit the Apache = portion > to trunk. >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Paul J. Reder >=20 > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: [Fwd: Re: [Patch]: Add a couple of cases to the apr_ldap_set_opt= ion=20 > function.] > Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 22:41:10 -0500 > From: Paul J. Reder > To: APR dev list. >=20 > Just in case it would help in evaluating these APR changes this is the > link to the Apache-trunk code, which uses these APR changes, that I'm > waiting to commit... >=20 > http://people.apache.org/~rederpj/Apache-trunk_rebind.diff >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Paul J. Reder >=20 > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: [Patch]: Add a couple of cases to the apr_ldap_set_option=20= > function. > Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:57:17 -0500 > From: Paul J. Reder > To: APR dev list. > References: <47604914.5030007@remulak.net> >=20 > Brad confirmed that this should work for Novell. My pass through the > limited Solaris docs I was able find seemed to indicate this should = work. >=20 > http://people.apache.org/~rederpj/apr-util-ldap.diff >=20 > Any more reviews? Anyone to commit it? >=20 > I was hoping to get this committed so I could commit the Apache trunk > code that uses this before I go on vacation next week. >=20 > Thanks again, >=20 > Paul J. Reder wrote: >> In keeping with the APR concept of hiding LDAP differences, I added = a=20 >> couple >> of cases to the apr_ldap_set_option function. One of the cases has=20 >> differences >> between at least the openLDAP and Tivoli SDKs so I added both of them = for >> consistency and to handle possible differences in other SDKs. >>=20 >> Folks who know the other SDKs should check if any #ifs need to be added >> to these cases for any of the other SDKs. >>=20 >> Once someone commits this patch I will be able to commit the Apache = portion >> of the rebind code.