apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: svn commit: r602176 - /apr/apr/trunk/network_io/unix/sockaddr.c
Date Mon, 10 Dec 2007 23:20:17 GMT
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Joe Orton wrote:
>> The previous behaviour makes far more sense, and it would not be 
>> unreasonable for applications to rely on it.  In fact it looks like 
>> the APR_IPV6_ADDR_OK flag is exactly a case which relies on that 
>> behaviour, and is now presumably broken.
> Interesting.  So, if we modify this to honor only the case of
> APR_IPV4_ADDR_OK plus the APR_INET6 family, it would satisfy you?

Patch committed, please examine and see if this covers your concern?

> Of course at this point, it's not possible to do so with a trivial
> patch, since apr_sockaddr_ip_get never sees that flag.

Ignore me as usual, quoting the wrong side of the equation.

View raw message