Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87003 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2007 00:06:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Nov 2007 00:06:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 27687 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2007 00:06:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 27636 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2007 00:06:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 27621 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2007 00:06:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:06:35 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lucian.grijincu@gmail.com designates 64.233.184.227 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.184.227] (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:06:36 +0000 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 50so557446wri for ; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:06:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=75ebETbydeGJer6+qdvCstGOqdlis6Hg3ykE9xIOhLo=; b=B7ZXV2Ec96j5TM2JtKavOY8fHpgj3G064AnPtn/OXdMXyikqYANiHmnu8qrHZs1dpaghFe8mrelKQj/p/npO2a4WY7kJJ70H4qSZQI/1osf3zL4mC5Bs8zOgOOpEfKTzob9gZuMeXgwqcl0c2z2nKNWWXvIzKlEaAHh/Q3vGR1Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gyKBxoF3ZY8YxN2hMNh152+l7SDGjisedJWAnGmtvEcY5r0zmsTLw1jtXrZigUoh0CgK06llih9/ssHvIoqbrjyMQkCLNh0cT8OhWHHvKnUkuG56Fxm6X8mf4yb/3WoeB7FJfkBOw/8yr+7LmGKL3zyY480b7IbxyLXogwakInM= Received: by 10.90.92.10 with SMTP id p10mr1651899agb.1194048374302; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.105.18 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Nov 2007 17:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 02:06:14 +0200 From: "Lucian Adrian Grijincu" To: "Guenter Knauf" Subject: Re: Interprocess semaphores and read/write locks Cc: dev@apr.apache.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Nov 3, 2007 1:55 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > >> Hi Lucian, > > Just to be sure I'm interpreting this right: for this semaphore to be > > used in multiple processes it must lie in a shared memory area, isn't > > it? > http://developer.novell.com/documentation/libc/libc_vol2/index.html?page=/documentation/libc/libc_vol2/data/akqakys.html > > HTH helped a lot :) http://developer.novell.com/documentation/libc/libc_vol2/index.html?page=/documentation/libc/libc_vol2/data/al8dfgi.html It seems to support SysV semaphores (or at least it's documented to do so). Thanks, Lucian