Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <4738E813.5010708@rowe-clan.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:56:03 -0500
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com>
CC: dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Re: Showstoppers to apr release(?)
References: <4712FCC2.5080704@rowe-clan.net>
 <cc67648e0711121536j5d2409c9y18a05e10060635b2@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <cc67648e0711121536j5d2409c9y18a05e10060635b2@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Oct 15, 2007 12:38 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>> Here's my list of open issues which should probably be determined before
>> we roll out 1.2.x, I was hoping we were further along than this on Unix
>> in particular;
> 
> Are there still showstoppers for rolling 1.2.12?

Thank you for raising the question, I was spinning around talking to folks
at AC about any issues they were aware of.  It's Paul's desire to actually
fix sendfile/darwin if the solution is obvious, and it may be (use sendfile
but detach either hd or tr vectors).  AFAICT it's otherwise ready.

I simply need to understand dynamic dbd/dbm, decide that my patch to win32
and netware was fair, or if we need 2-tiers (APR_HAVE_DBFOO, APR_BUILD_DBFOO)
to solve the built-in or dso-loadable modules and passing provider triggers
on the compile line.

It will roll tomorrow, if only to ensure httpd has something good to work with.

Bill