Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 23:25:50 +0200
From: Guenter Knauf <fuankg@apache.org>
To: wrowe@rowe-clan.net,
 dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r587240 - /apr/apr-util/trunk/include/apu.hnw
Message-ID: <yhPvMkxLZwGA2gALDLk8RR21jmJChmH3R0qMKA1XCUX@akmail>
References: <471D0A34.2090603@rowe-clan.net>
 <F3DkRi4PcpELYD3RYAS6NxSh2wXxHZZFW3CPXEETxDU@akmail>
 <471D1279.7090802@rowe-clan.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Bill,
> Guenter Knauf wrote:
>> one question though: if I build the drivers as DSO then I think I need =
to
>> build libapr-util itself without these defines, but the drivers need it=
 -
>> or am I missing something? If so how do we deal with that then?

> I reread your question and I'm confused.  If you build linking to
> libgdbm, for example, and define APU_HAVE_GDBM, then why would you
> NOT want to define that to 1 while building apr-util?
I meant if I want to build apr-util without f.e. APU_HAVE_PGSQL =3D no pgs=
ql driver, but instead want to build the driver separately as a DSO module=
=2E..
In this case telling a developer in apu.h with "APU_HAVE_PGSQL 1" that lib=
apr-util has pgsql build in is wrong; but nevertheless I need to define it=
 when I want to build the driver itself.

Guen.