Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lucian.grijincu@gmail.com
 designates 66.249.82.239 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=Z0iRBPsL/O2tKgETVW2HwJ/Sla8vW4RjzCsjVP8mw+ujF7kPkgDpooasK4UuWHSjOZDQQRMMaKxvdt+cm4htAJ1eCl4bRVqoNi6uLNwLJTvlGAgvOZ2mU8uyWj5qFyCiV+LJ2Qc3LSTM7kDwxTOOPles7H/+8QcVe6gz11Oo0qA=
Message-ID: <acf3f2e60710110335g1c9cc9c6g21f6e0dd9b0ab310@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:35:37 +0300
From: "Lucian Adrian Grijincu" <lucian.grijincu@gmail.com>
To: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
Subject: Re: Tagging 1.2.* Sat night or Sun a.m.
Cc: "APR Developer List" <dev@apr.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <470DD429.90908@rowe-clan.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <470DD429.90908@rowe-clan.net>

On 10/11/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Depending on my weekend.
>
> I found the bug, I'll commit the fix friday after I vet it a bit more.
> Win32 apr_file_dup2's new flags bits for stdio channels were the buggers,
> needed to mask those off in appropriate ways, but I'm not done validating
> the fix.
>
> I've committed to trunk the build changes that let us almost seamlessly
> transition from .dsp to .vcproj, for x86 and x64.  [Actually, they are
> seamless here because we don't try stuffing /D "SYM=With a space" at
> the resource compiler.  httpd is not so lucky].
>
> I don't plan to backport the /D WINNT change for x86, or the Win9x
> targets.  Save that for 1.3.  But there's no sense in run time tests
> of 9x for x64 ;-)  Otherwise, it goes over to 1.2 as-in trunk.
>
> So the dsp improvements roll on to apr-iconv and apr-util for releases
> there too.  We should have a really ready-to-rock x64 build schema, all
> it still needs is a top level Makefile.win to make things easy, which
> I'm about to crib from httpd (including ssl detection logic for apr 1.3,
> but nothing that rich for the other trees.)
>
> So what of y'all - anything else to slide in before the weekend?  If
> you are still at it Saturday, be sure to holler so I don't accidentally
> roll right over anyone's toes.
>

Do my patches against configure.in, apr.hnw and apr.hw fixing the
apr_ino_t ( http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43417 )
issue have a chance of getting accepted (aka should I try to test them
on other configurations to see whether they break something on some
systems)?

--
Lucian