apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lucian Adrian Grijincu" <lucian.griji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ABI change when _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 due to use of ino_t
Date Fri, 12 Oct 2007 19:04:45 GMT
On 9/18/07, Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@gmail.com> wrote:

> I wonder if an APR_INO_T_FMT is needed and whether it can be added to
> 1.2.x or 0.9.x branches.
>

For whatever reason someone might want to print an apr_ino_t.
As I understand the versoining rules, this can't be added in neither
0.9 nor 1.2, but can make it in 1.3. Is there a need for such a
#define? If yes, I'll update the updated patch Joe sent to include
this too (only on trunk which I think is the 1.3 wannabe).

--
Lucian

Mime
View raw message