apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lucian Adrian Grijincu" <lucian.griji...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Tagging 1.2.* Sat night or Sun a.m.
Date Fri, 12 Oct 2007 17:57:46 GMT
On 10/12/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> >
> > WORSE you just f***ed up the user who chose a different order for their
> > includes, which sucks to be them.  Please don't do such nonsense to them.
>
> Belay that assessment, I see you snuck this in after the header protect
> macro ;-)
>
> It's still not acceptable to add apr_ino_t until 1.3.0 no matter how it's
> hidden.
>

It's not added. it's present in apr_file_info.h since 1.2.0

> I had gone so far as to offer no outward facing explanation of the 1.3.0
> solution to win32 handles, but they could pass a constant which would
> achieve the effect.  That too was vetoed, so we simply won't add a new
> interface no matter how cloaked it is :)
>
> Bill
>

Mime
View raw message