apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: ABI change when _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 due to use of ino_t
Date Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:52:23 GMT
Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote:
> On 9/18/07, Lucian Adrian Grijincu <lucian.grijincu@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I wonder if an APR_INO_T_FMT is needed and whether it can be added to
>> 1.2.x or 0.9.x branches.
>>
> 
> For whatever reason someone might want to print an apr_ino_t.
> As I understand the versoining rules, this can't be added in neither
> 0.9 nor 1.2, but can make it in 1.3. Is there a need for such a
> #define? If yes, I'll update the updated patch Joe sent to include
> this too (only on trunk which I think is the 1.3 wannabe).

Yes - for 1.3 this would be fine, although doesn't upcasting the apr_ino_t
to a uint64_t solve this for everyone in a really portable manner?

Bill

Mime
View raw message