apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: svn commit: r587240 - /apr/apr-util/trunk/include/apu.hnw
Date Mon, 22 Oct 2007 21:47:17 GMT

Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Bill,
>> Guenter Knauf wrote:
>>> one question though: if I build the drivers as DSO then I think I need to
>>> build libapr-util itself without these defines, but the drivers need it -
>>> or am I missing something? If so how do we deal with that then?
>> I reread your question and I'm confused.  If you build linking to
>> libgdbm, for example, and define APU_HAVE_GDBM, then why would you
>> NOT want to define that to 1 while building apr-util?
> I meant if I want to build apr-util without f.e. APU_HAVE_PGSQL = no pgsql driver, but
instead want to build the driver separately as a DSO module...
> In this case telling a developer in apu.h with "APU_HAVE_PGSQL 1" that libapr-util has
pgsql build in is wrong; but nevertheless I need to define it when I want to build the driver

Then how would apu_dbd internally be aware that PGSQL is a valid choice?


View raw message