Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Bill,
>> I just finished unpatching this same mess on win32. Would you please
>> revert?
> one question though: if I build the drivers as DSO then I think I need to build libapr-util
itself without these defines, but the drivers need it - or am I missing something? If so how
do we deal with that then?
The problem is the end user of the apr.h file expects to learn what apr-util
can, or cannot do. If they are variable through -D's the user learns nothing,
which isn't helpful.
|