Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <46D926C8.8030204@rowe-clan.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 03:46:00 -0500
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070719)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mladen Turk <mturk@apache.org>
CC: dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release apr 0.9.15 / 1.2.10 --- apr-util 0.9.14 / 1.2.9
References: <46D570BC.9030904@rowe-clan.net> <46D6FB42.7020502@apache.org>
 <46D9180A.7000009@rowe-clan.net> <46D91E71.2000805@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <46D91E71.2000805@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Mladen Turk wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> Mladen Turk wrote:
>>> Just to make it official cause my emails were treated as SPAM.
>>> testfile and testproc are failing on win32 (hope this note will pass)
>>
>> What a headache (your email list battles I mean - not that we have to
>> deal with some errors!)  Thanks for your efforts to get this to the list
>> (for some reason, thunderbird had no spam issues with the copies you had
>> cc'ed me directly).
>>
>> testfile now works on these branches.
>>
>> testpipe and testproc fail for apr_file_read with APR_EOF in three
>> unexpected places now, once I have those diagnosed I'll be ready to
>> reroll with only that code change (plus whatever folks decide to do
>> about the grbuf + uidbuf) today (Saturday) so Jim has a hope of
>> finishing the 2.x/1.3 rerolls.
>>
> 
> Hmm,
> testfile is fixed now, however testproc still fails with
> testproc            : \Line 68: expected <0>, but saw <70014>
> -Line 143: expected <0>, but saw <70014>
> 
> This is apr-1.2 branch.
> Are u seeing the same when running testall.exe -v?

Right.  That's what I just said ;-)  70014 == APR_EOF.

Bill