From dev-return-18936-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Mon Sep 10 04:53:57 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 59462 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2007 04:53:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Sep 2007 04:53:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 80550 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2007 04:53:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 80504 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2007 04:53:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 80493 invoked by uid 99); 10 Sep 2007 04:53:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 09 Sep 2007 21:53:49 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bojan@rexursive.com designates 203.171.74.242 as permitted sender) Received: from [203.171.74.242] (HELO beauty.rexursive.com) (203.171.74.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 04:53:45 +0000 Received: from [172.27.0.24] (shrek.rexursive.com [172.27.0.24]) by beauty.rexursive.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74A740B02; Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:53:23 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: svn commit: r574113 - /apr/apr/trunk/test/Makefile.in From: Bojan Smojver To: Sander Temme Cc: dev@apr.apache.org In-Reply-To: <7AA0242F-9446-465D-A026-4973F20A5253@apache.org> References: <20070910011749.BB5181A9832@eris.apache.org> <7AA0242F-9446-465D-A026-4973F20A5253@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:53:23 +1000 Message-Id: <1189400003.22304.97.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 (2.10.3-2.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sun, 2007-09-09 at 21:35 -0700, Sander Temme wrote: > Aaaah! What about the other tests later in the sequence? Usually > test targets complete every test, regardless of failures. The problem was that nobody ever knew that any of the tests actually failed, because make wouldn't stop. The idea, as understand it, is that if you run make, things should run from beginning to end, unattended. If tests fail midway through the run, then obviously things aren't working and they need attention. Each tester can then get into test directory and run other tests from the sequence by hand, if desired/required. -- Bojan